Where refuse collectors are most in demand
These are the US metro areas with the highest concentration of refuse collectors — not simply the biggest cities. Ranked using Bureau of Labor Statistics employment data.
How this ranking works
A location quotient compares how common a job is locally against how common it is nationally. 1.0 means exactly the national average. 2.0 means the job is twice as concentrated there as it is across the country as a whole.
We rank by concentration rather than raw headcount deliberately. The largest metros have the most of nearly every job simply because they have the most people — ranking that way would show you the same list of big cities for every occupation. Concentration tells you something different: where this work is disproportionately part of the local economy, which is where your experience carries the most weight.
Metro areas by concentration
-
1
Monroe, MI 5.1×
-
2
Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 4.4×
-
3
Traverse City, MI 4.0×
-
4
Arecibo, PR 3.3×
-
5
Mayaguez, PR 3.0×
-
6
Rocky Mount, NC 2.9×
-
7
Albany, GA 2.4×
-
8
Morristown, TN 2.2×
-
9
Greeley, CO 2.2×
-
10
Dothan, AL 2.2×
-
11
Harrisonburg, VA 2.1×
-
12
San Juan-Bayamon-Caguas, PR 2.1×
-
13
Tyler, TX 2.0×
-
14
Punta Gorda, FL 2.0×
-
15
Pueblo, CO 2.0×
-
16
Kahului-Wailuku, HI 2.0×
-
17
Chambersburg, PA 1.9×
-
18
Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA 1.9×
-
19
Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ 1.9×
-
20
Grand Junction, CO 1.9×
-
21
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, LA 1.8×
-
22
Montgomery, AL 1.8×
-
23
Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 1.8×
-
24
Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA 1.8×
-
25
Idaho Falls, ID 1.7×
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (2025). Areas with fewer than 100 people in this occupation are excluded — a handful of workers in a small town produces a dramatic ratio off a base too small to mean anything.
Highest paying metro areas
Concentration and pay are not the same thing, and they often point at different places. Cost of living is not adjusted for here — a higher figure in an expensive metro is not automatically a better outcome.
- San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA $42.03/hr
- San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA $37.29/hr
- Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN $37.25/hr
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA $36.70/hr
- Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL $36.27/hr
- Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA $36.10/hr
- Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA $35.15/hr
- San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA $33.32/hr
- Santa Maria-Santa Barbara, CA $32.16/hr
- Boulder, CO $32.02/hr
Outside the metros
BLS also reports rural and small-town regions separately. These often have far higher concentration and less competition for the same work.
- Southern South Carolina nonmetropolitan area 3.7× · $11.64/hr
- Lower West Mississippi nonmetropolitan area 3.3× · $17.43/hr
- Northwest Virginia nonmetropolitan area 3.1× · $15.50/hr
- Western North Carolina nonmetropolitan area 3.1× · $15.78/hr
- Northwest Alabama nonmetropolitan area 3.0× · $18.05/hr
- Southern West Virginia nonmetropolitan area 2.8× · $16.88/hr
- Central Oregon nonmetropolitan area 2.7× · $28.83/hr
- Eastern New Mexico nonmetropolitan area 2.7× · $23.07/hr
- Eastern North Carolina nonmetropolitan area 2.6× · $16.49/hr
- South Arkansas nonmetropolitan area 2.6× · $14.78/hr
- Northeast Virginia nonmetropolitan area 2.6× · $15.05/hr
- East Arkansas nonmetropolitan area 2.6× · $14.88/hr
Browse open refuse collectors
See what's actually hiring right now on LocalWork.
Employment and concentration figures are from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics programme and describe the whole occupation, not LocalWork listings. They are a guide to where work is concentrated, not a guarantee of current openings.